NEW PRESCRIPTION SYSTEM RAISES PRIVACY QU

Discussion in 'Article Discussion' started by Alfa, Mar 26, 2005.

  1. Alfa

    Alfa Productive Insomniac Staff Member Administrator

    Reputation Points:
    14,178
    Messages:
    38,480
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    117 y/o from The Netherlands
    NEW PRESCRIPTION SYSTEM RAISES PRIVACY QUESTIONS


    FRANKFORT -- Kentucky officials say a new system that allows doctors, pharmacists and police to access prescription records over the Internet is a faster, more efficient way to stop drug abuse and improve health care.


    But some civil libertarians and health experts are concerned about the privacy of the system and question whether it will end up discouraging doctors from writing some necessary prescriptions.


    For more than five years, Kentucky has tracked prescriptions for so-called schedule drugs, from the extremely powerful, addictive and often abused narcotics like OxyContin to simple cough medicines with codeine.


    Under the old system, dubbed Kasper -- Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting, pharmacists and doctors would fax requests for information to the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, which often took hours to fax back responses.


    The new program allows medical personnel and police to search for information online so they can get answers at any time.


    Cabinet inspector general Robert Benvenuti said drug abuse task force personnel and police can track doctor shopping -- when patients see more than one physician to get multiple prescriptions -- and doctors who might be abusing prescription authority.


    Dr. Bob Esterhay of the University of Louisville school of public health, said the availability of the information is helpful and a cause for concern.


    While medical personnel can get useful data and drug abuse can be interrupted, Esterhay wondered whether doctors might be somehow dissuaded from writing some prescriptions for needy patients knowing they may be scrutinized. And as an individual, Esterhay said he wondered about all that personal information available to so many people.


    "There are always issues in terms of an individual's privacy," Esterhay said.


    Benvenuti said law enforcement personnel must sign documents to reflect an ongoing investigation in order to access information. Health care professionals are covered by federal privacy rules.


    Benvenuti said during the years the Kasper system has been in place, there have been no reports of abuse.


    "I don't think there's any need for any concern whatsoever," said Benvenuti.


    Beth Wilson, director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky, said there should always be concern when people's privacy is at stake.


    Esterhay said basing the new system on the Internet also presents an opportunity for personal information to leak into the public eye.


    Examples of supposedly secure information being posted on public Web sites or hackers breaking into secret databases are now routine.


    Benvenuti said the computer security levels are similar to those a bank might use.


    "Any system is hackable," Benvenuti said. "It doesn't negate all the benefit."


    Nearly 87 percent of the inquiries during the first years of the system came from doctors, officials said. Law enforcement authorities accounted for 6 percent of inquiries and pharmacists made up 4 percent. A system originally designed to field 2,000 queries a year has recently received an average of 2,500 a week.


    "It's an interesting dilemma," Esterhay said. "You just hope all the people involved do their best to keep the information secure."
     
  2. zipoo

    zipoo Newbie

    Reputation Points:
    0
    Messages:
    115
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    how does this appy to other states?