THC-II: n-hexyl?

Discussion in 'Cannabis' started by Red_Baran, Sep 4, 2005.

  1. Red_Baran

    Red_Baran Silver Member

    Reputation Points:
    34
    Messages:
    98
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    from U.S.A.
  2. Nahbus

    Nahbus Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    780
    Messages:
    1,118
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    from U.S.A.
    what about THC-V... 500x as active. THC-VI may be more active than THC-V. How would one obtain/synthesize these?
     
  3. korky8097

    korky8097 Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    97
    Messages:
    632
    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    from U.S.A.
    sweet jesus 500x, i dont wanna be THAT high, guess that thc would last a while.
     
  4. Nature Boy

    Nature Boy Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    1,984
    Messages:
    3,878
    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    from ireland
    I could see the perks.
     
  5. sands of time

    sands of time Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    361
    Messages:
    1,267
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Thats why if this was an available drug, it would be offered in a microgram dose or something low like that.
     
  6. geoff856

    geoff856 Newbie

    Reputation Points:
    0
    Messages:
    31
    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    32 y/o
    Has anyone ever got there hands on some of this stuff?
     
  7. Solidly-here

    Solidly-here Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    389
    Messages:
    716
    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Super THC . . . it was around 30 years ago.


    I remember reading how to synthesize Super THC. It was in a book I got at a Head Shop. A friend at UC Berkeley made up a batch. I believe that it had Olivetol in it, a hard-to-get chemical.


    She said that it was real powerful, but I did not actually try any of it (I was in one of my Pot-vacation periods).
     
  8. dex_tree

    dex_tree Newbie

    Reputation Points:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    can't say i've ever heard of those, sounds very cool though.. Anyone got a molecular model or some sort of basic info on it's preparation?


    Would one have to synthesize this from scratch, or would ^9-THC be a precursor to it? Getting pure THC is hard enough unless you have the capabilities to synth it yourself...


    I'll definitly be looking into this, not that i'm expecting to be able to make it any time soon, but I'd like to here some trip reports on it..


    If the dose was so incredibly potent, I wonder if one would be able to achieve an ultra-high (think grams of bubblehash) without the nausea and whatnot that comes with such large amounts...


    I'll do some searching and come back with a report if I can find somethin
     
  9. Solidly-here

    Solidly-here Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    389
    Messages:
    716
    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Super THC is NOT Delta-9-THC.


    The synthetic THCs are fully created from other Chemicals. The way I remember it, they are impossible-for-Nature to make. They bind Tightly to the brain in the same sites as THC, but don't let go as quickly as THC. Therefore, the High gets HIGHER and Higher.


    As I said before, at least One of the Chemicals needed to synthesize it is closely watched by Uncle Sam (you need to have ID, and fill out a form for the DEA, in order to buy some). And the synthesis itself is NOT easy. There is a Bromide, which can be fatal if it's breathed in. If you want to make some, be sure and take a couple semesters of Organic Chemistry.


    For most of the World, Killer Pot is enough. This Super THC stuff is slightly dangerous to take, because if you OD a little bit, you are SKY HIGH for quite a while. Many people would be careless in their dosing, so it is for people who will use a scale each time they dose.


    It's sort of like eating too much Canna-Butter. You will be flying away, and end up frazzled (unless you can roll-with-the-punches for several hours).
     
  10. big_mac

    big_mac Silver Member

    Reputation Points:
    26
    Messages:
    55
    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    31 y/o
    there is sum article u can download on kazaa that describes the five THC's and yes, THC-V is supossebly 500 times more potent then the normal stuff but doesnt occur naturally in canabis. in the future it would be cool to genetically alter a canabis plant to produce THC-5, however, one hit would probably knock out an elephant
     
  11. southernhosp81

    southernhosp81 Newbie

    Reputation Points:
    1
    Messages:
    52
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Well si it possible to grow or make the 4 other thc's?
     
  12. Solidly-here

    Solidly-here Gold Member

    Reputation Points:
    389
    Messages:
    716
    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    All 5 Super-THCs can be Synthetically made.


    A good Organic Chemist could easily make-up any of the 5 "THCs." The only problem (though) is obtaining all of the Chemicals necessary for the Synthesis (and that's not a Big problem). The Synthesis of THC-III is easy enough. Personally, I would not Cook-up a Batch. I would be afraid that some idiot would try to roll-up a FAT Joint with the Super-strength THC (so he could show-off, and be a BIG man), and fry himself.


    Mother Nature, however, can't make ANY of the 5 THCs. They were all born in a Scientist's imagination. This process for Super-THC, is like the search for new RCs. A Chemist thinks up a new Formula, which is close to a Formula which already works (as a Psychedelic). Then, after thinking it up, he goes to the Lab, and produces some of it. AFter that, he finds someone to Test-dose it. ... "OK, how did it make you feel?"


    If a Tester gets High, then there is a NEW Research Chemical in the World. If not, scratch that one off of the List (and try out a different Formula).


    So, it would be safe to assume that 20-or-so different Super-THC formulas were tried, AND that 5 of those formulas WORK.